Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Oguagha, Innocent Ibuadinma v. Ronda Kaye Hughes-Oguagha

Oguagha, Innocent Ibuadinma v. Ronda Kaye Hughes-Oguagha
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 11, 2002

Oguagha, Innocent Ibuadinma v. Ronda Kaye Hughes-Oguagha

Opinion

Opinion issued July 11, 2002













In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas




NO. 01-01-00527-CV




INNOCENT IBUADINMA OGUAGHA, Appellant



V.



RONDA KAYE HUGHES OGUAGHA, Appellee




On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2000-34952




O P I N I O N

According to information provided by the trial court clerk, this is an appeal from a judgment signed on April 20, 2001. The record was due on June 19, 2001. Neither the clerk's record nor the reporter's record has been filed. The appellate filing fee of $125 has not been paid.

On May 30, 2002, the Court issued an order that stated, in part, as follows:

  • Appellant's motion for extension of time to file clerk's record is granted as follows: Subject to payment being made by appellant, the trial court clerk is ordered to file the clerk's record within 30 days of the date of this order. If the clerk's record is not so filed, at the expiration of such 30-day period, the trial court clerk is ordered to advise this Court in writing of the reason why the clerk's record has not been filed. If the reason is the failure of appellant to pay for the clerk's record, appellant is advised that his appeal will be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

    • Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee of $125. This appeal remains subject to dismissal at any time for his failure to pay the fee as set forth in this Court's order of August 23, 2001.

      The clerk's record has not been filed, and the trial court clerk advises that the reason is appellant's failure to pay for it. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee of $125. Appellant has not responded to this Court's order of May 30, 2002.

      Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

      PER CURIAM

      Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Taft, and Alcala.

      Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.