Crystal N. Taylor v. State
Crystal N. Taylor v. State
Crystal N. Taylor v. State
Opinion
Appellant's sole point of error complains of a statement made by the prosecutor during jury argument. She did not object to the statement, however, and therefore failed to preserve the matter for review. Mathis v. State, 67 S.W.3d 918, 926-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The point of error is overruled.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: November 15, 2002
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.