Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.

in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 14, 2002

in Re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






NO.03-02-00490-CV


In re Robert S. Howell, D.C. and First Rio Valley Medical, P.A.










ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY


We deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2002) (party may appeal interlocutory temporary injunction order); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1 (appeals from interlocutory orders will be accelerated); Reynolds, Shannon, Miller, Blinn, White & Cook v. Flanary, 872 S.W.2d 248, 251 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, no writ) (holding that party challenging temporary injunction has adequate remedy by accelerated, interlocutory appeal).





Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Filed: August 14, 2002

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.