Myja Kielyn Fletcher v. State
Myja Kielyn Fletcher v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-02-00236-CR
Myja Kielyn Fletcher, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50,498, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant Myja Kielyn Fletcher pleaded guilty to theft of a firearm. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 31.03(a), (e)(4)(C) (West Supp. 2002). The district court deferred adjudication and placed appellant on community supervision. The court later revoked supervision, adjudicated appellant guilty, and imposed sentence of ten months in state jail.
Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________ Lee Yeakel, Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel Affirmed Filed: August 8, 2002 Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.