Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Quintin Tremaine Riggins v. State

Quintin Tremaine Riggins v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 26, 2002

Quintin Tremaine Riggins v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00579-CR

Quintin Tremaine Riggins, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50,540, HONORABLE C. W. DUNCAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

A jury found appellant Quintin Tremaine Riggins guilty of criminal nonsupport. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 25.05 (West Supp. 2002). The district court assessed punishment at one year in state jail, but suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision for five years.

Appellant represents himself on appeal. Following a hearing, the district court found that appellant is not indigent and denied his request for a free appellate record. By this Court=s order, the reporter=s record of the indigency hearing was made a part of the appellate record. Appellant=s brief does not challenge the court=s ruling on indigence.

Appellant=s brief contains a narrative giving appellant=s side of the relevant events. These statements are not supported by the record before us. Similarly, there is no support for appellant=s remarks regarding the conduct of trial counsel. Appellant=s contention that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of inability to provide support is contradicted by the record. The court=s charge to the jury included an instruction on the affirmative defense.

Finding no merit to any issue raised by appellant, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

__________________________________________ Lee Yeakel, Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel Affirmed Filed: July 26, 2002 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.