Carl Wayne Bradberry v. State
Carl Wayne Bradberry v. State
Opinion
Appellant's retained attorney moved to withdraw in a motion stating that in his opinion there were no meritorious grounds for appeal. Appellant consented to the motion, which was granted. Appellant was given time to employ substitute counsel but did not do so. We have examined the record and find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed: July 26, 2002
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.