PER CURIAM

A motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief has been filed. The motion is not signed either by Enrique Alvarez, acting pro se, or a licensed attorney; instead, the motion was signed by a notary public. A person who is not a licensed attorney may not represent Alvarez in legal matters. See Crain v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm., 11 S.W.3d 328, 333 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1067 (2001) (non-attorney may not prepare and file mechanic's liens or lien affidavits on others' behalf); Harkins v. Murphy & Bolanz, 112 S.W. 136, 138 (Tex. Civ. App.--Dallas 1908, writ dism'd) (power of attorney does not authorize one to act as attorney-at-law). However, in the interest of expediting the appeal, this Court will grant appellant the relief he requests. Accordingly, on its own motion, this Court grants an extension of time to file appellant's brief. ⁽¹⁾ Appellant's brief is due June 28, 2002. However, we will only file a brief signed by Alvarez on his own behalf or signed by a licensed attorney representing Alvarez. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.1(a) (counsel must sign document for represented party and include State Bar of Texas identification number); 9.1(b) (party not represented by counsel must sign and give mailing address, telephone number and fax number, if any).

It is so ordered May 29, 2002.

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Do Not Publish

1. This court dismisses the improperly signed motion filed on appellant's behalf.