Pablo Rodriguez v. State
Pablo Rodriguez v. State
Opinion
The deadline for perfecting appeal was January 3, 2001. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. There is no indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
The appeal is dismissed.
Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 31, 2002
Do Not Publish
1. The district clerk did not send a copy of the notice to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c). We first learned of the attempted appeal on January 11, 2002, when the district clerk's record was received.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.