in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall...
in the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon Waynette Edwards and Alan Randall...
Opinion
ALAN RANDALL EDWARDS
BRITTNEY NICOLE EDWARDS, MINOR CHILDREN
Opinion
Shannon Waynette Edwards, appellant, has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss her appeal because she no longer wishes to prosecute her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Ben Z. Grant
Justice
Date Submitted: September 12, 2002
Date Decided: September 13, 2002
Do Not Publish
nt-family: Times New Roman">Anders, also filed a motion to withdraw. Counsel sent Holman a copy of the appellate brief and informed Holman of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record.
This Court informed Holman at that time that his response, if any, was due within thirty days. Holman has since requested two extensions of time to file his response brief. We granted both requests, but as of this date, Holman has not filed a pro se response. Nor has the State filed a brief in this case.
We have independently reviewed the record in this case and concur with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious points of error that may be raised. Since the briefs and arguments raised
therein are identical in each appeal, for the reasons stated in Claveton Holman v. The State of Texas, No. 06-02-00182-CR, we likewise affirm the trial court's judgment.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: May 28, 2003
Date Decided: July 8, 2003
Do Not Publish
1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.