Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.

Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 15, 2002

Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.

Opinion

















In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-02-00108-CV

______________________________




NANCY GROVES, Appellant


V.


WESTBANK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ACMP, INC., BUTLER
& HAILEY, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, AND ROY D. HAILEY, Appellees




On Appeal from the Number Three County Court at Law

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 739551









Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

Opinion



O P I N I O N


Nancy Groves, appellant, has filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.



Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice



Date Submitted: August 14, 2002

Date Decided: August 15, 2002



Do Not Publish

n style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif">                                              


On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 02-1036



                                                 




Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



MEMORANDUM OPINION

            This Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy concerning appellee Charles Bishop has been filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, under cause number 05-44129. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (West 2004), further action in this cause is automatically stayed.

            Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this case is abated and will be treated as closed. Any party may reinstate by promptly filing a motion with an attached certified copy of the order showing that the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted or terminated and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. In the event of reinstatement, any period that began to run and had not expired at the time of suspension will begin anew when the proceeding is reinstated.

 

 

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          September 27, 2005

Date Decided:             September 28, 2005


Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.