John Richmond Phillips v. State
John Richmond Phillips v. State
Opinion
07-01-0444-CR
07-01-0445-CR
Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
Appellant John Richmond Phillips filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on June 17, 2002, averring that he no longer wishes to prosecute his appeals. The Motion to Dismiss is signed by both appellant and his attorney.
Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant's motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and the appeals are hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Having dismissed
the appeals at appellant's personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Phil Johnson
Justice
Do not publish.
ndent m:val="1440"/>
NO. 07-10-00399-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 13, 2011
K. KYLE LEWIS, APPELLANT
v.
WACHOVIA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., APPELLEE
FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY;
NO. 236-242-52909; HONORABLE THOMAS W. LOWE III, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Appellant K. Kyle Lewis filed a motion to dismiss his appeal on December 20, 2010. The motion includes a certificate of conference but according to the certificate counsel for Lewis was unable to confer with counsel for appellee Wachovia Financial Services, Inc. We therefore withheld determination of Lewiss motion until the passage of ten days. Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5),10.3(a)(2). Wachovia filed no response to Lewiss motion.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion does not indicate an agreement of the parties with regard to the allocation of costs of the appeal. We therefore tax costs of the appeal against Lewis. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
Having dismissed the appeal at the request of Lewis, we will entertain no motion for rehearing, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.