Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha

Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 2, 2002

Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. v. Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Hussian Varsha

Opinion

PETROLEUM WHOLESALE V. SHABANA ENT

NO. 07-00-0356-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

APRIL 2, 2002

______________________________

PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, INC., APPELLANT

V.

SHABANA ENTERPRISES, INC. AND VARSHA HUSSAIN, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 133RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 97-44520; HONORABLE LAMAR MCCORKLE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Petroleum Wholesale, Inc. filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment that appellees Shabana Enterprises, Inc. and Varsha Hussain recover $11,000 plus interest and attorney’s fees.  The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed.  On May 2, 2001, the appeal was abated at the request of the parties to continue settlement negotiations.  By letter dated December 11, 2001, this Court notified counsel that the appeal had been reinstated and that Petroleum Wholesale’s brief was due to be filed by January 11, 2002.  In response, Petroleum Wholesale filed a motion for extension of time in which to file its brief and the Court granted the motion until February 11, 2002.  The brief was not filed.  By letter dated March 14, 2002, this Court notified counsel of the defect and also directed counsel to reasonably explain the failure to file a brief together with a showing that Shabana Enterprises and Varsha Hussain have not been significantly injured by the delay by March 25, 2002.  Counsel for Shabana Enterprises responded by forwarding copy of a letter dated March 25, 2002, to counsel for Petroleum Wholesale indicating that Shabana Enterprises was withdrawing the settlement agreement and proceeding with the case.  Counsel for Petroleum Wholesale did not respond to this Court’s letter and the brief remains outstanding.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with an order of this Court.   See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(a) and (c).

Don H. Reavis

   Justice

Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.