Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Jimmie P. Settler v. Lubbock Central Appraisal District

Jimmie P. Settler v. Lubbock Central Appraisal District
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 21, 2002

Jimmie P. Settler v. Lubbock Central Appraisal District

Opinion

NO. 07-01-0116-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


MARCH 21, 2002



______________________________




JIMMIE P. SETTLER, ET AL., APPELLANT


V.


LUBBOCK CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, APPELLEE




_________________________________


FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


NO. 90-728-964; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Jimmie P. Settler, et al., proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment that Lubbock Central Appraisal District recover delinquent taxes. Both the clerk's record and reporter's record have been filed. By letter dated November 15, 2001, this Court notified Settler that the brief was past due and that failure to reasonably explain the reasons therefor could result in dismissal. On November 27, 2001, appellant's brief was received. However, it did not comply with the requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. This prompted the Court to return the brief unfiled and direct Settler to file a brief in compliance with the rules within 25 days of November 30, 2001. Settler did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Don H. Reavis

Justice



Do not publish.

          Appellants George and Karen Chapman filed a motion to dismiss their appeal on December 8, 2008. The motion includes a certificate of conference indicating appellee Allstate Texas Lloyds is not opposed to the motion.

 

          The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion does not indicate an agreement of the parties with regard to the distribution of costs of the appeal. We therefore tax costs of the appeal against appellants. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

          Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

James T. Campbell

Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.