Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Steve P. Patterson and Kim Patterson v. Texas Department of Protective Services

Steve P. Patterson and Kim Patterson v. Texas Department of Protective Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 28, 2002

Steve P. Patterson and Kim Patterson v. Texas Department of Protective Services

Opinion

PATTERSON V. TDPS

NO. 07-02-0080-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 28, 2002

______________________________

STEVE P. PATTERSON and KIM PATTERSON,

Appellants

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE SERVICE,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 320 th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 62,466-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

_______________________________

DISMISSAL

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Steve P. Patterson and Kim Patterson, appellants, filed their pro se notice of appeal on January 14, 2002.  Accompanying the notice was neither a filing fee of $125.00 or proof of their status as paupers.  Consequently, this Court issued a letter, dated February 11, 2002, informing the Pattersons of the defect and that the failure to cure same within ten days could result in the dismissal of the appeal.  So too were they told of their need to file a docketing statement within the same time period.  The letter then was sent to their last known address, which address was reflected on the docket of the Potter County District Clerk.  The missive was returned, however, and on the envelope appeared the notation “FOE” (forwarding order expired) and a stamp directing that it be “return[ed] to sender not forwardable.”  No other address of the Pattersons have been provided to this court.  Nor has it received the filing fee mentioned above, proof enabling the Patterson to continue their appeal as indigents (as authorized by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure), or the docketing statement.    

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 (c) due to appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee and provide a docketing statement as previously directed by this Court.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.