Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Keyvan, Babak v. State

Keyvan, Babak v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 19, 2002

Keyvan, Babak v. State

Opinion

                                                            COURT OF APPEALS

                                                    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                               EL PASO, TEXAS

 

BABAK KEYVAN,                                              )

                                                                              )               No.  08-01-00093-CR

Appellant,                          )

                                                                              )                    Appeal from the

v.                                                                           )

                                                                              )             County Court at Law #6

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                     )

                                                                              )            of El Paso County, Texas

Appellee.                           )

                                                                              )               (TC# 20000C07322)

                                                                              )

 

 

O P I N I O N

 

Pending before the Court is Appellant=s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.2(a), which states that:

(a)        At any time before the appellate court=s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal if the party that appealed withdraws its notice of appealBby filing a written withdrawal in duplicate with the appellate clerk, who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.  An appellant must personally sign the written withdrawal.

 


Appellant and his attorney have filed and signed the motion to dismiss.  Appellant having complied with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a), the Court has considered this cause on Appellant=s motion and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed.  We therefore dismiss the appeal.

 

 

 

December 19, 2002

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 5

Larsen, J., Chew, J., and Preslar, C.J. (Ret.)

Preslar, C.J. (Ret.)(Sitting by Assignment)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.