Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Richard Lee Long v. State of Texas

Richard Lee Long v. State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 6, 2002

Richard Lee Long v. State of Texas

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-01-237 CR

____________________



RICHARD LEE LONG, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 77393




OPINION

Richard Lee Long pleaded guilty to the second degree felony offense of manslaughter. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 19.04 (Vernon 1994). The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. The record reflects the trial court followed the terms of a plea bargain between Long and the State, which provided for prosecution on a lesser included offense to the indicted offense of murder and for the abandonment of a punishment enhancement allegation. Long filed a notice of appeal, but the trial court denied Long's request for permission to appeal.

Appellate counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The brief concludes that the record presents no arguable error which would support an appeal, a conclusion with which we concur. On October 4, 2001, Long was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief if he so desired. As of this date, we have received no response from the appellant.

The general notice of appeal does not comply with the form required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Therefore, Long did not invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). We have reviewed the clerk's record and the reporter's record for issues over which appellate jurisdiction might exist, and have found no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 1, 2002

Opinion Delivered February 6, 2002

Do Not Publish

Before Walker, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.