Russell E. Galer, II v. Valencia Pollard
Russell E. Galer, II v. Valencia Pollard
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-02-167-CV
RUSSELL E. GALER, II,
Appellant
v.
VALENCIA POLLARD,
Appellee
From the 52nd District Court
Coryell County, Texas
Trial Court # COT-02-34107
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court dismissed Russell E. Galer, II’s lawsuit as frivolous under section 14.003(a)(2) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 14.003(a)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2002). Galer appealed.
Galer timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was filed in this Court on August 1, 2002. There is no reporter’s record. This Court has granted Galer two extensions of time to file his brief. Following the most recent extension, Galer’s brief was due on October 25. To date, no appellant’s brief has been filed.
Appellate Rule 38.8(a)(1) provides that if an appellant fails to timely file his brief, the Court may:
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief.
Id. 38.8(a)(1).
More than thirty days have passed since Galer’s brief was due. We notified him of this defect by letter dated November 6, 2002. Id. 42.3, 44.3. He has not responded to our letter. Id. 42.3, 38.8(a)(1). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Id. 38.8(a)(1).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Davis,
Justice Vance, and
Justice Gray
Dismissed for want of prosecution
Opinion delivered and filed November 27, 2002
Do not publish
[CV06]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.