Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine
Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-02-025-CV
PAUL EARL DORSEY,
Appellant
v.
GARY L. JOHNSON
AND JOE MISSILDINE,
Appellees
From the 52nd District Court
Coryell County, Texas
Trial Court # COT-99-32530
CONCURRING OPINION
Until the precedential value of the majority opinion in Jacobo v. Binur is established, I will continue to note my disagreement with this court’s manner of reviewing no-evidence summary judgment motions which reference summary judgment evidence. I respectfully note my disagreement with the portion of the opinion discussing the application of the traditional standard of review for summary judgments to this no-evidence motion for summary judgment. See Jacobo v. Binur, 70 S.W.3d 330, 339-344 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet. h.)(Gray, J. dissenting). The error, however, does not prevent a proper result in this case. Accordingly, I concur in the judgment.
TOM GRAY
Justice
Concurring opinion delivered and filed October 9, 2002
Do not publish
gn: justify"> TOM GRAY
Justice
Before Chief Justice Davis,
Justice Vance, and
Justice Gray
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed July 18, 2001
Do not publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.