Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Carl Preston Autrey v. State

Carl Preston Autrey v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 6, 2002

Carl Preston Autrey v. State

Opinion

Carl Preston Autry v. State






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-01-384-CR

No. 10-01-394-CR


     CARL PRESTON AUTRY,

                                                                              Appellant

     v.


     THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                              Appellee


From the 82nd District Court

Robertson County, Texas

Trial Court # 99-0916719-CR

                                                                                                                

MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                                                                                

      The trial court adjudicated Carl Preston Autry’s guilt for possession of amphetamine in the amount of one gram or more but less than four grams, revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision, and assessed his punishment at five years’ imprisonment. The court imposed Autry’s sentence on October 4, 2001. Autry filed a notice of appeal with the district clerk on November 19. He filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal with this Court on the same date. Upon receipt of Autry’s motion, we docketed his appeal under our cause number 10-01-384-CR.

      We received a copy of Autry’s notice of appeal from the district clerk on November 26. We docketed Autry’s notice of appeal under our cause number 10-01-394-CR. The clerk’s record was filed on December 7. Because these are duplicate appeals, we will dismiss the latter appeal.

      We have never ruled on Autry’s request for an extension of time to file his notice of appeal. The motion complies with Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and 26.3(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 26.3(b). Accordingly, we grant the motion.

      The notice of appeal we received from the district clerk and the clerk’s record should have been filed in cause number 10-01-384-CR. They have now been filed there. We dismiss cause number 10-01-394-CR because it is a duplicate case. Id. 43.2(f).


                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Gray

Cause number 10-01-394-CR dismissed;

motion in cause number 10-01-384-CR granted

Opinion delivered and filed February 6, 2002

Do not publish

[CR25]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.