Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Burley Johnson v. Mike White

Burley Johnson v. Mike White
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 15, 2002

Burley Johnson v. Mike White

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                   NUMBER 13-02-252-CV

 

                             COURT OF APPEALS

 

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

 

 

BURLEY JOHNSON,                                                              Appellant,

 

                                                   v.

 

MIKE WHITE, ET AL.,                                                             Appellee.

 

 

                        On appeal from the 260th District Court

                                  of Orange County, Texas.

 

 

                                   O P I N I O N

 

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, BURLEY JOHNSON, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 260th District Court of Orange County, Texas, in cause number D-970374-C.  No clerk=s record has been filed due to appellant=s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record. 

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk=s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On June 25, 2002, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record,  this Court=s notice, and appellant=s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 15th day of August, 2002.

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.