Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2002

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 16, 2002

Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and Joe Morales v. Honofre Rodriguez, Jr.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                   NUMBER 13-02-141-CV

 

                             COURT OF APPEALS

 

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

 

HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION

AND JOE MORALES,                                                           Appellants,

 

                                                   v.

 

HONOFRE RODRIGUEZ, JR.,                                                   Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

 

                         On appeal from the 93rd District Court

                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 

                                   O P I N I O N

 

                    Before Justices Yanez, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND JOE MORALES, attempted to perfect an appeal from a ruling made by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. C-1990-01-B.  The clerk’s record was received on March 18, 2002, and a supplemental clerk’s record was received on April 19, 2002. 

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that no appealable order had been entered in this cause.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16th day of May, 2002.

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.