Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Eugene Henry Bourgeois v. State

Eugene Henry Bourgeois v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 10, 2003

Eugene Henry Bourgeois v. State

Opinion

Opinion issued April 10, 2003





















In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-03-00081-CR

____________



EUGENE HENRY BOURGEOIS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 917593




MEMORANDUM OPINION

We are without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Appellant was sentenced in this case on November 18, 2002. No motion for new trial was filed. The deadline for filing notice of appeal was therefore December 18, 2002, 30 days after sentencing. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant's notice of appeal was filestamped in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals on November 27, 2002. However, notice of appeal was not filed in the trial court until January 22, 2003, 35 days after the deadline.

Notice of appeal must be filed with the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c)(1). In Douglas v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 606-07 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.), the notice of appeal was mailed to the court of appeals and not filed in the trial court until four days after it was due. No motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was filed. We held that under these circumstances, we were bound to follow the precedent of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), and dismissed the appeal.

Accordingly, because notice of appeal was not timely filed in the trial court, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.