Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Jeffery S. Haufler & Robyn Haufler v. Patti Sedita, Stephanie Martin, and Guerrero, Biggar, Martin & Sedita, L.L.P.

Jeffery S. Haufler & Robyn Haufler v. Patti Sedita, Stephanie Martin, and Guerrero, Biggar, Martin & Sedita, L.L.P.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 27, 2003

Jeffery S. Haufler & Robyn Haufler v. Patti Sedita, Stephanie Martin, and Guerrero, Biggar, Martin & Sedita, L.L.P.

Opinion

Opinion issued March 27, 2003













In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00862-CV

____________



JEFFREY HAUFLER AND ROBYN HAUFLER, Appellants



V.



PATTI SEDITA, STEPHANIE MARTIN, AND GUERRERO, BIGGAR, MARTIN AND SEDITA, L.L.P., Appellees




On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2002-06202




O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed on July 29, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on August 12, 2002. Appellant, Jeffrey Haufler, filed an affidavit of indigence on September 5, 2002. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1c (1) provides that an appellant must file the affidavit of indigence with or before the notice of appeal. Thus, in the instant case, appellant's affidavit of indigence was filed late, 24 days after the filing of the notice of appeal. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1c(3) provides that the appellate court may extend the time to file the affidavit of inidgence if, within 15 days of the deadline for filing the affidavit, the party files in the appellate court a motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). In this case, appellant would have had to file in this Court a motion for extension of time to file the affidavit of indigence by August 27, 2002. Appellant Jeffrey Haufler filed no such motion for extension in this Court.

Accordingly, on February 6, 2003, we ordered that this case would be dismissed without further notice if appellant did not pay the $125 filing fee by March 10, 2003. March 10, 2003 has passed and appellant Jeffrey Hausler has not paid the $125 filing fee.

Accordingly, we dismiss appellant Jeffrey Hausler's appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(b),(c).

On February 6, 2003, we granted appellant, pro se, Robyn Haufler's motion to withdraw her appeal.

This appeal is concluded.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.