Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

in Re: Israel Scott

in Re: Israel Scott
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 28, 2003

in Re: Israel Scott

Opinion

Opinion issued February 28, 2003























In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-03-00182-CV

____________



IN RE ISRAEL SCOTT, Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Israel Scott, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court order the judge of the 9th District Court, Waller County, to dismiss for want of jurisdiction the State's motion to revoke relator's community supervision. Relator argues that only the 155th District court of Waller County has jurisdiction over his community supervision because relator was sentenced and placed on community supervision in that court. Relator also requests a stay in the proceedings in the 9th District Court until a writ of mandamus issues.

"The requirement that persons seeking mandamus relief establish the lack of an adequate appellate remedy is a 'fundamental tenet' of mandamus practice." Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); see also Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Walker, 787 S.W.2d 954, 955 (Tex. 1990) (orig. proceeding). The jurisdiction of the trial court is an appealable issue. See, e.g., Rivera v. State, 981 S.W.2d 336, 341 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.); Miller v. State, 981 S.W.2d 447, 448-49 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1998, pet. ref'd).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

The motion for stay is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.