Larry D. Williams v. Vera Hamilton
Larry D. Williams v. Vera Hamilton
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-03-102-CV
LARRY D. WILLIAMS APPELLANT
V.
VERA HAMILTON APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 48 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On August 7, 2003, we notified appellant that his amended brief had not been filed as required by appellate rule of procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P. 38.6 (a); See T ex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s amended brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.
DELIVERED: September 11, 2003
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.