IN THE INTEREST OF D.F.M.

        On April 1, 2003, appellant filed a motion to extend time to file notice of appeal.  On April 18, 2003 we notified appellant, in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3., that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal and motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal were not timely filed.  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.
        It is the opinion of the court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).  Accordingly, we deny the motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                               PER CURIAM

PANEL D: GARDNER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED: May 22, 2003

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.