Richard Hattox v. Ronnie Blasingame
Richard Hattox v. Ronnie Blasingame
Opinion
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
RICHARD HATTOX APPELLANT
RONNIE BLASINGAME APPELLEE
We
have considered "Appellant's Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It
is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss
the appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of
the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let
execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 17, 2003
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.