Benjamin Franklin Floyd v. State
Benjamin Franklin Floyd v. State
Opinion
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FLOYD APPELLANT
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
Appellant Benjamin Franklin Floyd attempts to appeal from the trial court's November 12, 2002 order denying DNA testing. His notice of appeal was due in the trial court on December 12, 2002. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). On December 30, 2002, appellant filed in this court a request for extension of time to appeal from the denial of his motion for DNA testing. Although this court originally granted the motion, it later withdrew its order on March 11, 2003, upon learning that appellant had not filed a notice of appeal in the trial court pursuant to rules 26.2(a) and 26.3. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a), 26.3. We informed appellant that we did not believe we had jurisdiction over the appeal and provided him an opportunity to respond demonstrating this court's jurisdiction.
We have reviewed appellant's response that was filed on March 21, 2003, and have concluded that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because no notice of appeal has been filed in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3(a). Thus, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL F: DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: April 17, 2003 1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.