TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00634-CR

Kyle Ray Pruett, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 51893, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kyle Ray Pruett appeals from an order revoking community supervision. The underlying offense is burglary of a building, for which appellant was sentenced to eighteen months= incarceration in state jail. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 30.02 (West Supp. 2003).

Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to withdraw is granted.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

Lee Yeakel, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson Affirmed Filed: February 21, 2003 Do Not Publish