Opinion by: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 4, 2003

AFFIRMED

Juan Olveda ("Olveda") was convicted of four charges of indecency with a child and two charges of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Olveda's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeals have no merit. Counsel provided Olveda with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Olveda did not file his own brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

Alma L. López, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH