Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Jimmy Collier v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 12, 2003

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-03-00159-CR

______________________________

JIMMY COLLIER, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court

Upshur County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13,248

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Jimmy Collier has appealed from his conviction pursuant to his guilty plea for delivery of a controlled substance. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), the trial court has filed its certification of his right to appeal in which the trial court certified that this was a plea bargained case and that Collier has no right to appeal, and also that he has waived his right to appeal.

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) provides in pertinent part, "The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The trial court's certification affirmatively shows that Collier has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See High v. State, No. 10-03-004-CR, 2003 WL 21299383 (Tex. App.âWaco June 4, 2003, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication).

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Jack Carter

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Justice

Date Submitted:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â December 11, 2003

Date Decided:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â December 12, 2003

Do Not Publish

will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal.

We overrule Remsburg's sole point of error and affirm the trial court's judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: March 5, 2007

Date Decided: March 30, 2007

Do Not Publish

1. If Remsburg had requested and received such an instruction, and if the jury had found him guilty of the attempted offense, rather than the offense alleged in the indictment, he would have faced a punishment assessed within the range provided for class A misdemeanor offenses. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 15.01(a), (d) (Vernon 2003). Alternatively, if the jury had found Remsburg guilty of only criminal trespass, he would have faced a punishment assessed within the range provided for class B misdemeanors. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. Â§ 30.05 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.