Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

in the Matter of the Marriage of Frances Marie McClure and Malcolm Wright McClure and in the Interest of Patrick Joe McClure, Minor Child

in the Matter of the Marriage of Frances Marie McClure and Malcolm Wright McClure and in the Interest of Patrick Joe McClure, Minor Child
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 29, 2003

in the Matter of the Marriage of Frances Marie McClure and Malcolm Wright McClure and in the Interest of Patrick Joe McClure, Minor Child

Opinion

















In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-03-00048-CV

______________________________




IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

FRANCES MARIE McCLURE AND

MALCOLM WRIGHT McCLURE AND

IN THE INTEREST OF

PATRICK JOE McCLURE, A MINOR CHILD




On Appeal from the 300th Judicial District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19778*RH02









Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Frances Marie McClure has filed a notice of appeal from the division of property in her divorce from Malcolm Wright McClure. The judgment was signed February 3, 2003. The clerk's record is required in an appeal, and it was due on or before April 4, 2003. The clerk's record has not been filed. Appellant is not indigent and is thus responsible for paying or making adequate arrangements to pay the clerk's fees for preparing the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On May 5, 2003, we contacted counsel by letter to provide notice and an opportunity to cure the defect, directing him to respond on or before May 15, and warning him that, if we did not receive an adequate response by that date, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Counsel has not contacted this Court. The clerk's record has not been filed, and the district clerk's office has informed our clerk that no arrangements have been made to pay for its preparation.

The appeal is dismissed.



Donald R. Ross

Justice



Date Submitted: May 28, 2003

Date Decided: May 29, 2003

hideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00146-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                            VIRGLE WAYNE GRANBERRY, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District Court

                                                             Lamar County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 23820

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Virgle Wayne Granberry has filed a pro se notice of appeal from his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a disabled person.  On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court’s certification of right of appeal stated that this was a plea agreement case and that Granberry has no right of appeal. 

            Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). 

            Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows Granberry has no right of appeal, and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

            We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

 

 

 

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          August 2, 2011          

Date Decided:             August 3, 2011

 

Do Not Publish          

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.