David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson
David A. Sheffield and Ed J. Cain v. Kevin Wilson
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0223-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
AUGUST 12, 2003
______________________________
ED CAIN, HARDIN COUNTY SHERIFF AND
DAVID A. SHEFFIELD, COUNTY ATTORNEY, APPELLANTS
V.
KEVIN WILSON, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 356 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARDIN COUNTY;
NO. 42,906; HONORABLE BRITT PLUNK, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ed Cain and David Sheffield, appellants, appeal the trial court’s order denying their plea to its jurisdiction. We must dismiss the appeal.
Appellants’ brief was due June 30, 2003. By letter dated July 9, 2003, we notified appellants that the due date for the brief had passed, and that we had received neither their brief nor a motion for extension of time to file it. Citing Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8, the letter also notified appellants that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasonably explaining their failure to file a brief, together with a showing that the appellee has not been significantly injured by the failure, was submitted by July 22, 2003. Appellants have not filed such a response, nor have they since submitted a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, having given all parties more than the required ten days’ notice, we dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. Proc . 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).
James T. Campbell
Justice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.