Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

David Pettigrew v. State

David Pettigrew v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 15, 2003

David Pettigrew v. State

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0176-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 15, 2003

______________________________

DAVID PETTIGREW,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 181 ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 46,046-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Appellant David Pettigrew, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn

  Justice

Do not publish.$åßÑ

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Arnaldo Ortiz (appellant) filed notices of appeal from his two convictions of aggravated sexual assault on January 15, 2008.  On the same day, the trial court filed its certification representing that appellant has the right of appeal in both cases.  However, the appellate record reflects that appellant failed to sign the certifications pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) which requires the certifications to be signed by appellant and a copy served on him. (footnote: 1)

Consequently, we abate the appeals and remand the causes to the 46 th District Court of Wilbarger County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall take such action necessary to secure and file with this court certificates of right to appeal that comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) by April 3, 2008.  Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request the same on or before April 3, 2008.  

It is so ordered.  

Per Curiam

Do not publish.  

FOOTNOTES

1:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.