Rosa Serrano v. Ryan's Crossing Apartments
Rosa Serrano v. Ryan's Crossing Apartments
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
ROSA SERRANO, )
) No. 08-03-00369-CV
Appellant, )
) Appeal from the
v. )
) County Court at Law #5
RYAN=S CORSSING APARTMENTS and )
DARRYL S. VEREEN, ) of El Paso County, Texas
)
Appellees. ) (TC# 2002-J00062-5)
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is Appellee Darryl S. Vereen=s motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3. This rule states:
Under the following circumstances, on any party=s motion--or on its own initiative after giving ten days= notice to all parties--the appellate court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order. Dismissal or affirmance may occur if the appeal is subject to dismissal:
(a) for want of jurisdiction;
(b) for want of prosecution; or
(c) because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time.
Tex.R.App.P. 42.3.
Appellant has named Mr. Vereen as an appellee in the appeal before us. However, Mr. Vereen was not a party in the action below from which Appellant has appealed. The filing of a notice of appeal invokes the jurisdiction of the appellate court only Aover all parties to the trial court=s judgment or order appealed from.@ Tex.R.App.P. 25.1(b). Because Mr. Vereen was not a party to the trial court=s judgment, this Court has no jurisdiction over him. Accordingly, we grant Appellee Darryl S. Vereen=s motion and dismiss the appeal as to him only under Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a).
September 19, 2003
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice
Before Panel No. 3
Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and Chew, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.