Ray Walker and Pam Walker v. Earle Humphreys and Nicette Humphreys
Ray Walker and Pam Walker v. Earle Humphreys and Nicette Humphreys
Opinion
In this landlord-tenant litigation, Ray Walker and Pam Walker appealed the judgment obtained by Earle Humphreys and Nicette Humphreys for wrongful retention of a security deposit. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 92.109 (Vernon 1995). On August 22, 2003, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.9. The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellants failed to file their brief by the June 27, 2003, due date. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(2). The appellants did not request an extension of time to file the brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d).
We have reviewed the record for fundamental error, and find none. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on September 12, 2003
Opinion Delivered September 25, 2003
Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ. 1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.