in Re: Dan Thomas
in Re: Dan Thomas
Opinion
IN RE: DAN THOMAS,
RELATOR
Relator Dan Thomas seeks a writ of mandamus requiring court reporter Felix Thompson to transcribe his notes from a pretrial hearing conducted on May 3, 1990.
This court has authority to issue writs of mandamus agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs against district and county court judges within our court of appeals district. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b) (Vernon Supp. 2003). Otherwise, our authority to issue such a writ exists only to the extent necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a). Relator's petition describes neither circumstance. Accordingly, Relator's petition for a writ of mandamus against Felix Thompson is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SAM GRIFFITH
Justice
Opinion delivered December 3, 2003.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Dan Thomas, who is the Relator in Cause No. 20,692, styled The State of Texas v. Dan Thomas, pending on the docket of the Third District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on December 1, 2003, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that A Writ of Mandamus Should Not Issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus against Felix Thompson is Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction.
Sam Griffith, Justice.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.