in Re: Frank Brown
in Re: Frank Brown
in Re: Frank Brown
Opinion
IN RE: FREDRICK BROWN,
RELATOR
Relator Fredrick Brown seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to rule on his pending motion to quash or, in the alternative, to "Show Cause why said ORDER should not be followed." Based upon our review of Relator's petition, we conclude that Relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the writ of mandamus is denied.
SAM GRIFFITH
Justice
Opinion delivered September 24, 2003.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.