in Re: Gonzalo R. Dellvallo
in Re: Gonzalo R. Dellvallo
Opinion
IN RE: GONZALO R. DELLVALLO,
RELATOR
Relator Gonzalo R. Dellvallo has filed an application for writ of mandamus seeking an
order directing the 86th Judicial District Court of Kaufman County to require the State to show
cause for Relator's continued confinement. We deny the writ.
We first note that Relator's motion does not comply with rules 52.3 and 52.7 of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. Additionally, Relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief
requested. As Relator correctly states, each court of appeals may issue writs of mandamus,
agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, against a judge of a district or county
court in the court of appeals district. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1) (Vernon 2003).
However, mandamus issues only where the record establishes (1) a clear abuse of discretion or
the violation of a duty imposed by law, and (2) the absence of an adequate remedy at law.
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992).
Here, Relator contends in substance that the State has abused its discretion and seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to address the State's inaction. Because Relator does not complain of any alleged abuse of discretion or violation of a legal duty by the trial court, he
has not complied with the first requirement for establishing his entitlement to the requested relief. See id. Accordingly, Relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
JAMES T. WORTHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion delivered September 10, 2003.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.