DANIEL BRUCE GARRETT,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

Appellant Daniel Bruce Garrett pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery. The trial court assessed his punishment at twenty years in prison to run concurrently, as far as possible, with another sentence which Appellant was serving. Appellant subsequently filed a notice of appeal. We affirm.

Appellant's counsel, in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969), states that she has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the opinion that the record reflects no reversible error and there is no error upon which an appeal can be predicated. She further relates that she is well acquainted with the facts in this case. In compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), Appellant's brief presents a chronological summation of the procedural history of the case, and further states that Appellant's counsel is unable to present any arguable points of error. ⁽¹⁾ We have likewise reviewed the record for reversible error and have found none.

As required by Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), Appellant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. We carried the motion for consideration with the merits of the appeal. Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant's counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion delivered August 6, 2003.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.