Karl Lynn Shackelford v. State
Karl Lynn Shackelford v. State
Opinion
KARL LYNN SHACKELFORD,
APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE
Karl Lynn Shackelford ("Appellant") appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated, for which he was sentenced to confinement for three hundred thirty days. Appellant has not raised any issues on appeal. We affirm.
Appellant was charged by information with driving while intoxicated. The information also charged that Appellant had been previously convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated. A jury found Appellant guilty as charged, the trial court sentenced Appellant to confinement for three hundred thirty days, and this appeal followed.
Appellant has filed no briefs in this cause. In the interest of justice, we may review Appellant's appeal for fundamental error. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). Having reviewed the record, we have found no fundamental error. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
Opinion delivered May 14, 2003.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Griffith, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.