Robert E. Kramer v. Michael Sizemore, Darrell W. Deel, Jim C. Pittcock and Rodrick D. Arthur
Robert E. Kramer v. Michael Sizemore, Darrell W. Deel, Jim C. Pittcock and Rodrick D. Arthur
Opinion
ROBERT E. KRAMER,
APPELLANT
V.
PRECINCT 2
MICHAEL SIZEMORE,
DARRELL W. DEEL, JIM C. PITTOCK
AND RODRICK D. ARTHUR,
APPELLEES
Appellant is attempting to appeal a justice court's judgment signed on December 4, 2002. On December 31, 2002, this court advised Appellant that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of the court because there is no final judgment or appealable order from a county or district court contained therein. Appellant was further advised that this appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before January 15, 2003, he furnished information showing the jurisdiction of this court.
Jurisdiction over an appeal of a justice court judgment lies in the county or district court. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.001, 51.002 (Vernon 1997). To invoke this court's jurisdiction, Appellant must obtain a final, appealable order or judgment from the county or district court. See id. As of January 21, 2003, Appellant has not provided us with such an order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinion delivered January 22, 2003.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Griffith, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.