Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Robert E. Kramer v. Michael Sizemore, Darrell W. Deel, Jim C. Pittcock and Rodrick D. Arthur

Robert E. Kramer v. Michael Sizemore, Darrell W. Deel, Jim C. Pittcock and Rodrick D. Arthur
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 22, 2003

Robert E. Kramer v. Michael Sizemore, Darrell W. Deel, Jim C. Pittcock and Rodrick D. Arthur

Opinion

DISMISSAL FORM FOR CRIMINAL CASES ON ANT'S MOTION/OR WD NOA

NO. 12-02-00382-CV



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT



TYLER, TEXAS





ROBERT E. KRAMER,

§
APPEAL FROM THE

APPELLANT





V.

§
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE,

PRECINCT 2

MICHAEL SIZEMORE,

DARRELL W. DEEL, JIM C. PITTOCK

AND RODRICK D. ARTHUR,

§
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES



MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant is attempting to appeal a justice court's judgment signed on December 4, 2002. On December 31, 2002, this court advised Appellant that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of the court because there is no final judgment or appealable order from a county or district court contained therein. Appellant was further advised that this appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before January 15, 2003, he furnished information showing the jurisdiction of this court.

Jurisdiction over an appeal of a justice court judgment lies in the county or district court. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.001, 51.002 (Vernon 1997). To invoke this court's jurisdiction, Appellant must obtain a final, appealable order or judgment from the county or district court. See id. As of January 21, 2003, Appellant has not provided us with such an order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered January 22, 2003.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Griffith, J.



(PUBLISH)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.