Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Sean Steward Foster v. State

Sean Steward Foster v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 16, 2003

Sean Steward Foster v. State

Opinion







NUMBERS 13-03-550-CR, 13-03-551-CR, and 13-03-552-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________



SEAN STEWART FOSTER, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 377th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion



Appellant, SEAN STEWART FOSTER, attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. Sentence in these causes was imposed on August 7, 2003. Untimely motions for new trial were filed on September 17, 2003. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on September 8, 2003, but were not filed until September 17, 2003. Said notices of appeal are untimely filed. Appellant filed untimely motions to permit late filing of the motions for new trial and notices of appeal on September 25, 2003.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and motions requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, and appellant's untimely motions, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant's untimely motions to permit late filing of motions for new trial and notices of appeal are dismissed. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16th day of October, 2003.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.