Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2003

Ronald Van Meter, Robert Hawk and Michael Turner v. Datacom Custom Manufacturing, Inc.

Ronald Van Meter, Robert Hawk and Michael Turner v. Datacom Custom Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 21, 2003

Ronald Van Meter, Robert Hawk and Michael Turner v. Datacom Custom Manufacturing, Inc.

Opinion











NUMBER 13-03-284-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________



RONALD VAN METER, ET AL., Appellants,



v.


DATACOM CUSTOM MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Hinojosa, Yanez, and Garza

Opinion



Appellants, RONALD VAN METER, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1245-02-F. The clerk's record was received on May 16, 2003. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on June 16, 2003. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On July 16, 2003, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants' failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellants' failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed

this the 21st day of August, 2003.





Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.