Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Wade v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Wade v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 8, 2004 · Taft, Nuchia, Jennings
252 S.W.3d 425; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 3289; 2004 WL 745128 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wade v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jerome K. Wade has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See TexR.App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 *426 (Vernon Supp. 2004) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(l), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Jerome K. Wade did not adequately respond. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

The appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.