Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Ex Parte Cozzi

Ex Parte Cozzi
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 29, 2004 · Panelf, Livingston, Dauphinot, Holman
138 S.W.3d 454; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 3809; 2004 WL 912714 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ex Parte Cozzi

Opinion

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant Raymond Dominic Cozzi, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his article 11.072 application for writ of habeas corpus as moot. 1 Article 11.072 provides that “the trial court shall enter a written order granting or denying *455 the relief sought in the application.” 2 An applicant may appeal from the denial of any or all relief. 3 In this case, the trial court did not enter the statutorily mandated ruling but instead dismissed the application. While Appellant could have very well fried a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court, requesting that the trial judge be ordered to rule on his application, 4 he does not have the right to appeal from a dismissal of his application. 5 We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

1

. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

2

. Id. art. 11.072, § 6(a) (emphasis added).

3

. Id. art. 11.072, § 8.

4

. See Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding); Von Kolb v. Koehler, 609 S.W.2d 654, 655-56 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1980, orig. proceeding).

5

. See TexCode Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072, § 8; Ex parte Noe, 646 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.