in Re Horace Mann Lloyds
in Re Horace Mann Lloyds
Opinion
Opinion issued August 12, 2004
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-03-01326-CV
____________
IN RE HORACE MANN LLOYDS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Horace Mann Lloyds, has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw the petition for writ of mandamus, in which he complained that Judge Reece Rondon abused his discretion by (1) signing an “Order Appointing Receiver and Order of Reference” on December 15, 2003, (2) erroneously characterizing a July 18, 2003 “default judgment” as a final judgment, and (3) not ruling on relator’s motion for new trial.
Relator explains in his motion to withdraw his petition that he and the real-party-in-interest, James Roberson, have settled all matters in controversy between them and that the complaints against Judge Reece Rondon have become moot.
We grant relator’s motion to withdraw his petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Alcala and Bland.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.