Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Janet Neel Karr v. State

Janet Neel Karr v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 10, 2004

Janet Neel Karr v. State

Opinion

Opinion issued June 10, 2004









In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas





NO. 01–04–00241–CV





JANET NEEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR; DAVID MICHAEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR, Appellants


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellees





On Appeal from the 335th District Court

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 32619





MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellants JANET NEEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR; DAVID MICHAEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR have neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2004) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants JANET NEEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR; DAVID MICHAEL KARR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF AUSTIN KARR AND TYLER KARR did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          The appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Higley.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.