Timothy Brian Churchill and Churchill Motors v. Matt Purkey
Timothy Brian Churchill and Churchill Motors v. Matt Purkey
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-04-241-CV
TIMOTHY BRIAN CHURCHILL APPELLANTS
AND CHURCHILL MOTORS
V.
MATT PURKEY APPELLEE
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On October 11, 2004, we notified appellants that their briefs have not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P . 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellants’ briefs have not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 12, 2004
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.