Timothy Brian Churchill and Churchill Motors v. Matt Purkey
Timothy Brian Churchill and Churchill Motors v. Matt Purkey
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-04-241-CV
TIMOTHY BRIAN CHURCHILL APPELLANTS
AND CHURCHILL MOTORS
V.
MATT PURKEY APPELLEE
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
----------
On October 11, 2004, we notified appellants that their briefs have not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellants’ briefs have not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 12, 2004
NOTES
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.